Trimo vs Conductor: two approaches to local agent orchestration

Both run agents locally — the differences are in the details

Conductor and Trimo share a core philosophy: coding agents should run on your own hardware, not in the cloud. Both keep your source code local, both let you bring your own API keys, and both support multiple agent frameworks.

But they differ in architecture, isolation model, workflow design, and how they handle orchestration. If you're choosing between them, those differences matter.

How Conductor works

Conductor is a macOS desktop application for running coding agents. You install it on your Mac, point it at a repository, and it manages agent sessions locally.

Desktop-native. Conductor is a macOS app — not a web platform, not a CLI. You interact with it through its desktop interface.
Agent-agnostic. Conductor supports multiple agent frameworks including Claude Code and Codex. You choose which agent to use for each task.
Bring your own keys. You provide your own API keys for the LLM providers. Conductor doesn't intermediate or mark up API calls.
Local execution. Agents run on your Mac. Your code stays on your machine.

Conductor's approach is to provide a polished desktop interface for managing agent sessions on macOS, with support for the major agent frameworks.

How Trimo works

Trimo splits the stack into two parts:

A cloud dashboard for orchestration — dispatching work, monitoring pipelines, reviewing diffs, writing prompts.
A local daemon that runs on your machine and manages Docker containers where agents actually execute.

The cloud handles the UI and coordination. Your machine handles the compute. Source code never leaves your machine — the cloud dashboard only receives metadata like pipeline status and run timing.

Key differences

Isolation model

This is the biggest architectural difference. Trimo runs each agent in its own Docker container with kernel-level isolation — separate filesystem, network namespace, process space, and resource limits. An agent can't access your host filesystem, your credentials, or other running agents.

Conductor isolates agents using git worktrees — each agent gets its own working copy of the repository on a separate branch. This prevents file-level conflicts between agents and avoids merge issues. However, agents still share the host environment: same network, same ports, same system processes, same credentials. There's no kernel-level boundary between an agent and your host machine.

For autonomous runs where you walk away and let agents work unsupervised, container-level isolation provides a stronger safety boundary. For supervised sessions where you're watching the agent work, git worktree isolation may be sufficient — and it requires no Docker setup.

Platform and access

Conductor is a macOS desktop app. You manage agents from that app on your Mac. This works well for individual developers on macOS, but limits access to the machine where the app is running.

Trimo's dashboard is web-based. You can monitor pipelines, review diffs, and dispatch work from any browser — your laptop, your phone, a different machine. The daemon runs on any Mac with Docker, and multiple daemons can connect to the same dashboard.

Parallel execution

Both tools support running multiple agents. With Trimo, each agent gets its own Docker container — fully isolated filesystems, no port conflicts, no shared state. You can run as many agents in parallel as your hardware supports.

Conductor also supports multiple simultaneous agents, each in its own git worktree. This prevents file-level conflicts between agents. However, agents share the host network and process space, so port conflicts (e.g. two agents running dev servers on port 3000) can still occur. Trimo's container-level isolation eliminates this class of problems entirely.

Pipeline continuity

Trimo organizes work into pipelines. Each pipeline has a branch and a history of runs. Follow-up prompts automatically build on previous commits and context. The agent picks up where the last run left off — same branch, same state, full awareness of what happened before.

This makes iterative development natural: write a prompt, review the output, course-correct, and iterate — all with persistent context across runs.

Team workflows

Trimo's web dashboard is designed for team use. Multiple developers can see active pipelines, review agent output, and coordinate work. Multiple machines can each run a daemon connected to the same dashboard, creating a shared pool of execution capacity.

Conductor is oriented toward individual use on a single Mac.

Feature comparison

Capability	Conductor	Trimo
Platform	macOS desktop app	CLI + web dashboard (macOS)
Execution location	Local (on your Mac)	Local (Docker containers)
Code location	Stays on your machine	Stays on your machine
Isolation	Git worktree (file-level)	Container-level (kernel namespaces)
Agent framework	Claude Code, Codex	Any agent (Claude Code, Codex, custom)
LLM provider	Bring your own key	Bring your own key
Pipeline continuity	Per-session	Built-in — runs chain with full context
Monitoring	Desktop app	Web dashboard (accessible from any device)
Team support	Individual use	Shared dashboard, multiple daemons
Environment customization	Host environment	Custom Docker images
Git integration	Standard git	Auto-commit, auto-push, branch management, PR creation
Setup requirement	macOS app install	Docker + CLI install

When to use Conductor

You want a desktop-native experience. If you prefer a polished macOS app over a CLI + web dashboard, Conductor provides that.
You don't need Docker isolation. For supervised agent sessions where you're actively watching, git worktree isolation may be sufficient.
You're a solo developer on macOS. If you don't need team features or cross-platform support, Conductor's single-machine model is simpler.
You want minimal setup. No Docker installation required — just install the app and configure your API keys.

When to use Trimo

You need real isolation. Docker containers provide kernel-level isolation — agents can't access your host filesystem, credentials, or other agents. Essential for unsupervised autonomous runs.
You run agents in parallel. Each agent gets its own container with no shared state. No filesystem conflicts, no port collisions.
You want iterative workflows. Pipeline continuity across multiple runs, each building on the context and commits of the last.
You work on a team. Shared web dashboard for monitoring, reviewing, and coordinating agent work across multiple developers and machines.
You need cross-platform or remote access. Web dashboard works from any device. Daemon runs on macOS or Linux.
You want full environment control. Custom Docker images let you pre-install tools, configure dependencies, and standardize the execution environment.
You want git automation. Auto-commit, auto-push, branch management, and safety wrappers built into every container.

The bottom line

Conductor and Trimo agree on the most important thing: your code should stay on your machine, and you should bring your own API keys. Where they differ is in the infrastructure layer.

Conductor provides a polished desktop experience for running agents on macOS with git worktree isolation and automated PR workflows. Trimo provides kernel-level container isolation, pipeline orchestration, team workflows, and a web-based dashboard — at the cost of requiring Docker.

If you need strong isolation, iterative pipelines, or team features, Trimo is the stronger choice. If you want a lightweight desktop app for supervised agent sessions on your Mac with fast setup and no Docker requirement, Conductor is worth a look.

Get started with Trimo